
(12/29/08 – Initial BadBadTeacher.com Report)
Hope Ashley Jacoby, 23, athletic trainer at Tustin High School in Tustin, California has been arrested on suspicion of engaging in unlawful sex acts with a male student.

Jacoby was arrested last week on suspicion of oral copulation of a minor and unlawful sex with a minor.
She reportedly came to the attention of authorities who were informed of the unlawful acts by a student who allegedly saw a text message photograph on the cell phone of the alleged victim.
Police say that the victim is between 14 and 17-years old and police have also indicated that there might be other victims.
Investigators believe Jacoby had sex with the male athlete on several occasions, including at her San Juan Capistrano home and her car while parked near an elementary school.
Following her arrest, Jacoby was reportedly jailed in lieu of $100,000 bail but has since been released on bail.
Reportedly Jacoby worked for a company hired by the school to train its athletes in various sports and in late November, Jacoby submitted a letter of resignation to the district, stating that Friday, December 19th would be her last day because she intended to further her education. Jacoby was arrested on what was reportedly her final day at the school.
Police were encouraging anyone with information on Jacoby or any other possible victims to contact the sheriff’s department at (714) 628-7170.
07/29/09 – Sentencing
Hope Jacoby, who earlier this month pleaded guilty to six counts involving sexual contact with a minor, has been sentenced to three years’ probation and ordered to perform 240 hours of community service.
The judge reduced the counts to which Jacoby pleaded guilty to misdemeanors over prosecutor’s objections.
The judge noted that Jacoby is a college graduate on her way to a productive life and is not likely to re-offend and that the victim was a male student who was 16 and 17 during the course of conduct and was a willing participant who had engaged in some deception to maintain the relationship.
Webmaster’s note: Thanks to “Jim” whose comment brought to our attention the interesting conclusion of this case.